Comments on: Holy Cow! Grassley uses “that word” again http://okhenderson.com/2009/12/02/holy-cow-grassley-uses-that-word-again/ Semi-official Blog of Radio Iowa Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:33:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Rick Fletcher http://okhenderson.com/2009/12/02/holy-cow-grassley-uses-that-word-again/#comment-1137 Rick Fletcher Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:28:41 +0000 http://okhenderson.com/?p=2174#comment-1137 He might not have lived off of the goverment tit but he's sure been sucking on it for a long time. He might not have lived off of the goverment tit but he’s sure been sucking on it for a long time.

]]> By: Lester Ness http://okhenderson.com/2009/12/02/holy-cow-grassley-uses-that-word-again/#comment-1134 Lester Ness Sun, 06 Dec 2009 22:13:40 +0000 http://okhenderson.com/?p=2174#comment-1134 I'm under the impression that the Senate has generous health and retirement plans, too. I’m under the impression that the Senate has generous health and retirement plans, too.

]]> By: RevRayGreen http://okhenderson.com/2009/12/02/holy-cow-grassley-uses-that-word-again/#comment-1088 RevRayGreen Thu, 03 Dec 2009 05:30:46 +0000 http://okhenderson.com/?p=2174#comment-1088 From 1995-2006 Subsidy Total $699,248.2­7 Crop Summary for Robin Grassley Crop Payments 1995-2006 Corn Subsidies $522,676 Soybean Subsidies $121,519 Wheat Subsidies $3,132 Oat Subsidies $102 wow, he and 50/50 Robin claimed $102 for Oats...........did they really need to do that ? From 1995-2006 Subsidy Total $699,248.2­7

Crop Summary for Robin Grassley

Crop Payments
1995-2006
Corn Subsidies $522,676
Soybean Subsidies $121,519
Wheat Subsidies $3,132
Oat Subsidies $102

wow, he and 50/50 Robin claimed $102 for Oats………..did they really need to do that ?

]]> By: Jamie Buelt http://okhenderson.com/2009/12/02/holy-cow-grassley-uses-that-word-again/#comment-1085 Jamie Buelt Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:07:34 +0000 http://okhenderson.com/?p=2174#comment-1085 To be honest, I think he is saying "teat," which is perhaps more colloquialism or even ag vernacular than vulgarity. Perhaps the senator should be more deliberate about elongating the vowel and make sure it's an "e" and not an "i" in future interview settings. But what do I know, he's been in the senate since before I could vote. To be honest, I think he is saying “teat,” which is perhaps more colloquialism or even ag vernacular than vulgarity. Perhaps the senator should be more deliberate about elongating the vowel and make sure it’s an “e” and not an “i” in future interview settings. But what do I know, he’s been in the senate since before I could vote.

]]>